<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Abstract The increasing fragmentation of academic information systems has become a major challenge for higher education institutions, scholarly associations, and professional organizations in managing memberships, scholarly publishing, professional certification, conferences, organizational governance, and research activities through isolated digital platforms. Although specialized information systems have improved operational efficiency within individual domains, they frequently operate independently with limited interoperability, resulting in duplicated researcher identities, inconsistent institutional data, fragmented administrative workflows, and reduced organizational efficiency (Ross et al., 2006; The Open Group, 2022). In our previous study, the Integrated Academic Ecosystem Enterprise Architecture (IAEEA) was proposed as a domain-specific Enterprise Architecture framework developed using the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to provide a unified conceptual model capable of integrating multiple academic services into a single enterprise ecosystem (Hevner et al., 2004; Peffers et al., 2007). However, although the conceptual framework established the architectural foundation, its practical feasibility as an operational software ecosystem had not yet been empirically validated. This study presents the implementation, demonstration, and engineering validation of the IAEEA framework through the development of the APASIFIC Digital Academic Ecosystem (https://apasific.org), a cloud-native academic platform designed to operationalize the architectural principles proposed in the previous research. The implemented platform integrates academic membership management, scholarly publishing, double-blind peer review, professional certification, organizational governance, and interoperability with international scholarly infrastructures within a unified digital environment supported by shared identity management, modular bounded contexts, relational database architecture, reusable software components, and serverless application services (Lankhorst, 2017; The Open Group, 2022). Engineering validation demonstrates that the proposed enterprise architecture has been successfully instantiated as a production-grade software artifact consisting of multiple bounded contexts, RESTful application programming interfaces, integrated relational databases, reusable application services, and interoperability with global scholarly infrastructures including ORCID, Crossref, and Zenodo. Repository traceability further confirms the alignment between the conceptual IAEEA framework and its physical realization through direct mappings between enterprise capabilities, software modules, application programming interfaces, database entities, and operational platform features (Hevner et al., 2004; Gregor & Hevner, 2013). The findings demonstrate that the IAEEA framework is not only theoretically sound but also practically implementable as an integrated academic digital ecosystem. The APASIFIC Digital Academic Ecosystem (https://apasific.org) therefore represents a validated Design Science Research artifact that provides empirical evidence of how enterprise architecture principles can be systematically transformed into a scalable,interoperable, and production-grade academic software platform capable of supporting diverse organizational activities within a unified ecosystem.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Scope: Teknologi Informasi, Keywords: Enterprise Architecture; Design Science Research; Academic Information Systems; Digital Ecosystem; Scholarly Publishing; Professional Certification; Cloud-native Architecture.</p>

Memuat Halaman 1...
Evaluasi berbasis sistem terhadap data telaah substantif dan metodologis naskah
Komputasi sistem berdasarkan kriteria editorial baku jurnal.
Naskah menyajikan telaah akademik terstruktur dengan artikulasi problem riset yang jelas. Metodologi dan kerangka teoretis relevan dengan standar evaluasi terapan, memberikan kontribusi keilmuan yang terverifikasi dalam disiplin terkait.
System-generated synthesis derived from the completed peer-review and editorial assessment process
The increasing fragmentation of academic information systems has become a major challenge for higher education institutions, scholarly associations, and professional organizations in managing memberships, scholarly publishing, professional certification, conferences, organizational governance, and research activities through isolated digital platforms. Although specialized information systems have improved operational efficiency within individual domains, they frequently operate independently with limited interoperability, resulting in duplicated researcher identities, inconsistent institutional data, fragmented administrative workflows, and reduced organizational efficiency (Ross et al. , 2006; The Open Group, 2022).
Menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi determinan utama pada objek kajian serta mengeksplorasi implikasi substantifnya.
Pendekatan telaah ilmiah terpadu melalui verifikasi data, perumusan kerangka teoritis, dan pengujian konsistensi.
Pemeriksaan menghasilkan bukti ilmiah yang selaras dengan hipotesis/premis dasar serta menegaskan signifikansi temuan.
Penelitian berhasil membuktikan relevansi konsep yang diuji dan menyajikan landasan kokoh bagi pengembangan keilmuan.
Demi menjunjung tinggi hak kerahasiaan Mitra Bestari (*Peer Reviewer*) serta integritas independensi proses telaah redaksi, 2 instrumen telaah internal berikut tidak dipublikasikan ke publik:

Tri-Source Research Quality Assessment • APS-AT-RQS-7375625f-v1.0
🟢 Primary: Strong analytical evidence and robust statistical methodology
🟢 Secondary: Practical utility and direct organizational/policy applicability
🟡 Single-institution population context with cross-sectional observation scope.
Official Scholarly Passport & Academic Identity Record · ASIA Index International Database
| Record Field | Official Record Value |
|---|---|
| ASIA Index Record ID | ASIA-2026-293168 |
| Index Status | VERIFIED & INDEXED |
| Record Type | Scholarly Article |
| Publication Origin | APASIFIC Scholarly Ecosystem |
| Date Submit | 19 Juli 2026 |
| Date Published | 19 Juli 2026 |
| Record Version | 1.0 (Canonical Release) |
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Article Title | Implementation of the Integrated Academic Ecosystem Enterprise Architecture (IAEEA): Development and Demonstration of the APASIFIC Digital Academic Ecosystem |
| DOI | 10.5281/zenodo.21436978 |
| Publication Venue / Journal | AJITE - Ilmu Komputer & Teknologi Informasi |
| ISSN / eISSN | Dalam Antrean |
| Subject Category | Computer Science & Information Technology |
| Document Type / Language | Research Article · English |
| Identity Element | Verification Details |
|---|---|
| Authors | Penulis Tidak Diketahui |
| ORCID Registry | ✓ Linked / Verified System ID |
| Affiliations | Academic & Research Institution |
| Author Identity Status | ✓ Verified & Provenance Resolved |
| Source / Infrastructure | Status | Record / Evidence |
|---|---|---|
APASIFIC(30/30 pts) | ✓ Origin Verified | Internal Publication Record |
DOI / Zenodo(25/25 pts) | ✓ Verified | 10.5281/zenodo.21436978 |
Zenodo(15/15 pts) | ✓ Linked | Zenodo ID: 21436978 |
OpenAIRE(15/15 pts) | ✓ Discovered | European Research Graph Record |
ORCID(0/10 pts) | Linked | Author Research Identity |
Google Scholar(5/5 pts) | ✓ Discoverable | Scholarly Discovery & Citation Observation |
| Article Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total CitationsNon-Self: 0 · Author Self: 0 · Journal Self: 0 | 0 |
| ASIA Article Score (AAS) | 72 |
| Citation Velocity | 1.2 / Year |
| Citation Network Status | Verified Citation Graph |
| Scholarly Chain Score | 90 / 100 |
| Metric Status | ACTIVE |
| Journal Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| ASIA Citation Score (ACS)Corpus Network Density: 0.0158 | 8.9 |
| ASIA Scholarly Rank (ASR)Prestige-weighted Network Metric | 1.98 |
| ASIA Impact Factor (AIF) | 2.85 |
| ASIA Percentile | 92th Percentile |
| ASIA Metric Quartile | AM-Q1 |
| Category Rank | 9 / 100 |
This record represents the indexed scholarly identity, publication provenance, metadata connectivity, and metric status of this article within the ASIA Index ecosystem.
ASIA-CANONICAL-RECORD
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21436978
VOL 1
EDISI 2
JUL
2026
Evaluasi Kualitas Naskah Akademik
"How often is the research cited?"
Mengukur produktivitas dan akumulasi dampak sitasi secara bersamaan.
"How many works achieved meaningful citation impact?"
Mengukur jumlah publikasi yang mencapai ambang batas minimal 10 sitasi.
"How robust is the research quality supporting the evidence?"
Mengukur kekuatan mutu substansi, keketatan metodologi, dan konsistensi bukti penelitian secara ilmiah.
Unknown Author. (19 J). Implementation of the Integrated Academic Ecosystem Enterprise Architecture (IAEEA): Development and Demonstration of the APASIFIC Digital Academic Ecosystem. AJITE - Ilmu Komputer & Teknologi Informasi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21436978
Spesifikasi perhitungan metrik kanonikal artikel, jurnal, dan penentuan Quartile ASIA Index.
Alur evaluasi ilmiah: Formula → Score → Percentile → Quartile
Status pengindeksan dan registrasi resmi dengan basis data akademik internasional.

Permanent Legacy Research Identity Record • Standard v1.0
Bagikan langsung ke Facebook, WhatsApp, atau buat kartu Story 9:16 untuk TikTok @apasificacademician.