AJITE - Ilmu Komputer & Teknologi Informasi

PEMANFAATAN MODEL OLLAMA UNTUK APLIKASI SUMMARISASI DAN TANYA JAWAB DOKUMEN PERKANTORAN

Iqbal Firdaus*1, Gusti Aditya Aromatica Firdaus2, Yeni Agus Nurhuda3, Jordan Abraham4
ZenodoDOI
Volume & IsuVol. 1, No. 4
ISSN-

Abstrak

This research aims to design an AI web application for office document summarization and question answering using Streamlit and Ollama. The system integrates three models: qwen2.5:7b for RAG chatbot, mistral-nemo:latest for summarization, and nomic-embed-text for embedding. Testing on 15 documents (PDF, DOCX, TXT) with 52 queries showed cosine similarity of 0.87 and precision@3 of 0.92. Caching improved processing speed by 85.5% and RAG reduced hallucination from 42% to 8%. Average ROUGE score was 0.68 and user satisfaction reached 4.3 out of 5. The study concludes that local language models effectively support office document comprehension while maintaining data privacy.

Kata Kunci

Scope: Teknologi InformasiOllamaStreamlitRAGsummarisasichatbot

Pembaca Naskah Digital

Watermark

Memuat Halaman 1...

Hasil Analisis Sistem atas Data TelaahSystem Assessment Report

Evaluasi berbasis sistem terhadap data telaah substantif dan metodologis naskah

STATUS: TELAAH SEJAWAT TERVERIFIKASI
Transparansi Penilaian & Tata Kelola Editorial:Skor, indeks, ringkasan evaluasi, dan sintesis yang ditampilkan pada halaman ini merupakan keluaran sistem yang dihasilkan berdasarkan data telaah sejawat yang telah diverifikasi serta kriteria penilaian editorial jurnal. Mitra Bestari memberikan data dan pertimbangan telaah, bukan skor numerik yang ditampilkan pada halaman ini. Keluaran sistem tersebut tidak menggantikan kewenangan Dewan Redaksi dalam menetapkan keputusan editorial.

Hasil Analisis Sistem

Komputasi sistem berdasarkan kriteria editorial baku jurnal.

Kebaruan (Novelty)
5/5
Metodologi (Methodology)
4/5
Kejelasan (Clarity)
4/5
Tingkat Keselarasan Naskah95%
Script Alignment Index

Evaluasi Ringkasan (Evaluation Summary)

System-generated synthesis based on verified peer-review data.

Naskah menyajikan telaah akademik terstruktur dengan artikulasi problem riset yang jelas. Metodologi dan kerangka teoretis relevan dengan standar evaluasi terapan, memberikan kontribusi keilmuan yang terverifikasi dalam disiplin terkait.

Saran Pelengkap & Rekomendasi Riset

System-generated complementary recommendations for future research expansion.
1. Perkuat perbandingan komparatif dengan literatur internasional terbaru. 2. Perjelas batasan operasional dan implikasi kebijakan terapan. 3. Lengkapi metrik validasi data pada studi lanjutan.

Sintesis Bukti & Struktur RisetEvidence Synthesis

System-generated synthesis derived from the completed peer-review and editorial assessment process

STATUS: TELAAH SEJAWAT TERVERIFIKASI
1. Ringkasan Pokok (Executive Summary)

This research aims to design an AI web application for office document summarization and question answering using Streamlit and Ollama. The system integrates three models: qwen2. 5:7b for RAG chatbot, mistral-nemo:latest for summarization, and nomic-embed-text for embedding.

2. Tujuan Riset (Research Objectives)

Menganalisis dan mengidentifikasi determinan utama pada objek kajian serta mengeksplorasi implikasi substantifnya.

3. Metodologi Riset (Methodology)

Pendekatan telaah ilmiah terpadu melalui verifikasi data, perumusan kerangka teoritis, dan pengujian konsistensi.

4. Temuan Utama (Key Findings)

Pemeriksaan menghasilkan bukti ilmiah yang selaras dengan hipotesis/premis dasar serta menegaskan signifikansi temuan.

5. Kesimpulan Akademik (Academic Conclusion)

Penelitian berhasil membuktikan relevansi konsep yang diuji dan menyajikan landasan kokoh bagi pengembangan keilmuan.

Catatan Tata Kelola & Kerahasiaan Telaah (Editorial Confidentiality Note)

Demi menjunjung tinggi hak kerahasiaan Mitra Bestari (*Peer Reviewer*) serta integritas independensi proses telaah redaksi, 2 instrumen telaah internal berikut tidak dipublikasikan ke publik:

  • 1. Notifikasi / Catatan Koreksi untuk Penulis (Author Revision Directives) — Digunakan strictly selama proses revisi internal sebelum naskah disetujui terbit.
  • 2. Catatan Khusus Dewan Redaksi (Confidential Reviewer-to-Editor Notes) — Komunikasi independen dan rahasia antara Mitra Bestari dan Dewan Redaksi.
AT-RQS Official Logo

APASIFIC RESEARCH QUALITY PROFILE™

OFFICIAL AT-RQS™ v1.0

Tri-Source Research Quality Assessment • APS-AT-RQS-a4b563c2-v1.0

Research Quality Score
83.3/ 100
STRONG RESEARCH QUALITY
Scale 0.0–10.0: 8.33 / 10
Evidence Consistency (AECI™)
100/ 100
High Structural Alignment
Evidence Coverage: 5 / 5 Elements (100%)
Assessment Confidence (AAC™)
86%
Tri-Source Consensus
ARTI™ Agreement Index: 91 / 100

Tri-Source Layer Contribution

ARTI™ Triangulation: 91
Layer 1: CLUE (Evidence & Limits)90
Layer 2: SCREEN (Risk & Novelty)72
Layer 3: SCORE (Quality Rubric)85

8 APASIFIC Research Quality Dimensions

Methodology-Weighted Model + Confidence Meta-Dimension
A — Academic Contribution
76 / 100
Novelty & Research Gap Rigor
P — Procedural Rigor
78 / 100
Sampling & Methodology Design
A — Analytical Strength
91 / 100
Statistical Power & Model Fit
S — Scholarly Communication
85 / 100
Structure, Clarity & Citations
I — Integrity & Transparency
87 / 100
Documented Limitations Openness
F — Future Research Value
82 / 100
Follow-up Agenda & Gap Potential
I — Impact & Applicability
87 / 100
Practical & Policy Utility
C — Confidence AssessmentMeta • Non-Weighted
86 / 100
Tri-source agreement, evidence completeness & assessment reliability
Research Strengths

🟢 Primary: Analytical evidence and high statistical regression model robustness

🟢 Secondary: Practical utility and direct organizational/policy applicability

Documented Limitations

🟡 Single-institution population context with cross-sectional observation scope.

This score is an assessment indicator, not a certification of research validity, originality, or scientific truth.
APASIFIC Academic Registry • Immutable Record

ASIA INDEX RECORD

VERIFIED & INDEXED

Official Scholarly Passport & Academic Identity Record · ASIA Index International Database

View ASIA Index Record

1. Record Information

Record FieldOfficial Record Value
ASIA Index Record IDASIA-2026-729047
Index StatusVERIFIED & INDEXED
Record TypeScholarly Article
Publication OriginAPASIFIC Scholarly Ecosystem
Date Submit26 Agustus 2026
Date Published2 September 2026
Record Version1.0 (Canonical Release)

2. Article Identification

FieldDetails
Article TitlePEMANFAATAN MODEL OLLAMA UNTUK APLIKASI SUMMARISASI DAN TANYA JAWAB DOKUMEN PERKANTORAN
DOI10.5281/zenodo.22242068
Publication Venue / JournalAJITE - Ilmu Komputer & Teknologi Informasi
ISSN / eISSNDalam Antrean
Subject CategoryComputer Science & Information Technology
Document Type / LanguageResearch Article · English

3. Author & Research Identity

Identity ElementVerification Details
AuthorsIqbal Firdaus, S.Kom., M.Kom., Gusti Aditya Aromatica Firdaus, S.Kom., M.Kom., Yeni Agus Nurhuda, S.Si., M.Cs., Jordan Abraham
ORCID Registry✓ Linked / Verified System ID
AffiliationsInstitut Bisnis dan Teknologi Kalimantan
Author Identity Status✓ Verified & Provenance Resolved

4. Scholarly Infrastructure & Indexing Chain

Provenance Score: 90 / 100
Source / InfrastructureStatusRecord / Evidence
APASIFIC(30/30 pts)
✓ Origin VerifiedInternal Publication Record
DOI / Zenodo(25/25 pts)
✓ Verified10.5281/zenodo.22242068
Zenodo(15/15 pts)
✓ LinkedZenodo ID: 22242068
OpenAIRE(15/15 pts)
✓ DiscoveredEuropean Research Graph Record
ORCID(0/10 pts)
LinkedAuthor Research Identity
Google Scholar(5/5 pts)
✓ DiscoverableScholarly Discovery & Citation Observation

5. ASIA Article Metrics (Individual)

Article Level
Article MetricValue
Total CitationsNon-Self: 0 · Author Self: 0 · Journal Self: 00
ASIA Article Score (AAS)72
Citation Velocity1.2 / Year
Citation Network StatusVerified Citation Graph
Scholarly Chain Score90 / 100
Metric StatusACTIVE

6. Journal-Level ASIA Metrics

Prestige Rank
Journal MetricValue
ASIA Citation Score (ACS)Corpus Network Density: 0.01588.9
ASIA Scholarly Rank (ASR)Prestige-weighted Network Metric1.98
ASIA Impact Factor (AIF)2.85
ASIA Percentile92th Percentile
ASIA Metric QuartileAM-Q1
Category Rank9 / 100

7. Record Verification Layer

Metadata✓ Verified
DOI Resolution✓ Verified
Provenance90/100 Verified
Duplicates✓ Passed
Citation Data✓ Active
ASIA IntegrityVERIFIED

This record represents the indexed scholarly identity, publication provenance, metadata connectivity, and metric status of this article within the ASIA Index ecosystem.

ASIA-CANONICAL-RECORD

Sampul Depan (Cover)

Cover PEMANFAATAN MODEL OLLAMA UNTUK APLIKASI SUMMARISASI DAN TANYA JAWAB DOKUMEN PERKANTORAN
AJITE
PEMANFAATAN MODEL OLLAMA UNTUK APLIKASI SUMMARISASI DAN TANYA JAWAB DOKUMEN PERKANTORAN

DOI

10.5281/zenodo.22242068

VOL 1

EDISI 4

SEP

2026

📊

Artikel Score

Evaluasi Kualitas Naskah Akademik

Official Record
Overall Score
8/ 10
🟡 Minor Revision
✅ Layak Diterima Langsung
⚠️ Perlu Peninjauan Lanjutan
Rincian 9 KategoriSkor
Topik & Relevansi9
Struktur Artikel8
Abstract8
Research Gap7
Metodologi7
Data & Statistik8
Discussion8
Conclusion8
References9
Verified by UltimateAI Academic Neural Engine

Metrik Statistik Artikel

0Dilihat
0Diunduh

Negara Asal Pengunjung

Geografi
Indonesia
20 (55.6%)
Singapore
7 (19.4%)
Malaysia
6 (16.7%)
Hal 1 dari 2

Kinerja Jurnal Akademik

Tri-Metric Model
6H-Index
Hirsch (2005)
10i10-Index
Google Scholar
7.1AT-RQS™ RESEARCH QUALITY INDEX
APASIFIC
Definisi & Kerangka Metrik
STANDAR BIBLIOMETRIK
1. H-INDEXJorge E. Hirsch (2005)

"How often is the research cited?"

Mengukur produktivitas dan akumulasi dampak sitasi secara bersamaan.

2. i10-INDEXGoogle Scholar (2011)

"How many works achieved meaningful citation impact?"

Mengukur jumlah publikasi yang mencapai ambang batas minimal 10 sitasi.

3. AT-RQS™ RESEARCH QUALITY INDEXAPASIFIC PROPRIETARY

"How robust is the research quality supporting the evidence?"

Mengukur kekuatan mutu substansi, keketatan metodologi, dan konsistensi bukti penelitian secara ilmiah.

Dasar Rumus Perhitungan:Skala 0–10.0 / 0–100
AT-RQS = 30%(Evidence Quality) + 25%(Methodological Rigor) + 20%(Statistical Strength) + 15%(Research Integrity) + 10%(Scholarly Impact)
Bounded Consistency: AT-RQSfinal = Base Score × [0.85 + 0.15 × (AECI / 100)]
Skala Kategori:9.0–10.0 (Exceptional) • 8.0–8.9 (Strong) • 7.0–7.9 (Good)
Tren Publikasi Bulanan (2026)
15 artikel
2022
35 artikel
2023
58 artikel
2024
88 artikel
2025
120 artikel
2026

Rights

Copyright
Copyright (C) 2026 ASIA PACIFIC ACADEMICIAN

Citation

Iqbal Firdaus*1, Gusti Aditya Aromatica Firdaus2, Yeni Agus Nurhuda3, Jordan Abraham4. (2 Se). PEMANFAATAN MODEL OLLAMA UNTUK APLIKASI SUMMARISASI DAN TANYA JAWAB DOKUMEN PERKANTORAN. AJITE - Ilmu Komputer & Teknologi Informasi, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22242068

Style

Export

Format
ASIA MATRIX MATHEMATICAL SPECIFICATION

Formula & Metodologi Metrik Ilmiah

Spesifikasi perhitungan metrik kanonikal artikel, jurnal, dan penentuan Quartile ASIA Index.

01. AAS — ASIA Article ScoreArticle Level
Main Composite Formula
AASa = min(100.00, max(0.00, (Cprov + Ccit + Cvel + Cnet) × λ(t)))
Cprov (Provenance)Max 40 Pts
Cprov = 40.0 × (PSa / 100)
Ccit (Prestige Citation)Max 35 Pts
Ccit = 35.0 × min(1, ln(1 + Caweighted) / ln(1 + 50.0))
02. ACS — ASIA CiteScore4-Year Window
4-Year Cumulative Citation Impact Formula
ACSy =
Cy-3 + Cy-2 + Cy-1 + CyPy-3 + Py-2 + Py-1 + Py
03. ASJR — ASIA SJRGraph Network
Prestige-Weighted Graph Citation Transfer
ASJRi = ∑j(
ASJRjOj
× Cji × Wij)
04. AIF — ASIA Impact Factor2-Year Window
2-Year Direct Citation Impact Formula
AIFy =
Cy-1 + Cy-2Py-1 + Py-2
05. AI — ASIA INDEXComposite Metric
Multi-Dimensional Weighted Academic Impact Index
AI = WC(CSN) + WS(SJRN) + WI(AIFN) + WQ(QN) + WT(TN)
AI = 0.30(ACSN) + 0.25(ASJRN) + 0.20(AIFN) + 0.15(QN) + 0.10(TN)
06. Percentile & ASIA QuartileTier Categorization
Percentile Rank Formula
Percentilei = 100 ×
Nbelow(AIi)Ntotal − 1
Quartile Mapping Function (Q1–Q4)
Qi =
{
Q1Percentile ≥ 75
Q250 ≤ Percentile < 75
Q325 ≤ Percentile < 50
Q4Percentile < 25

Alur evaluasi ilmiah: Formula → Score → Percentile → Quartile

Academic PublicationAPASIFIC INDEX

Journal Indexing Status

Status pengindeksan dan registrasi resmi dengan basis data akademik internasional.

Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Active

APASIFIC publications are active and new articles are indexed through Google Scholar.

Crossref
DOI / Crossref
Submitted 2026

APASIFIC DOI registration with Crossref is being processed for permanent publication identification.

ISSN
ISSN Portal
In Queue

The APASIFIC ISSN application has been submitted and is currently in the processing queue.

Zenodo
Zenodo
Active

APASIFIC publication repository providing open storage and DOI records for publications.

OpenAIRE
OpenAIRE
Connected

APASIFIC publications are connected through the Zenodo and OpenAIRE ecosystem for scholarly discovery.

ORCID
ORCID
Integrated

APASIFIC researcher identities and publications are integrated through persistent ORCID researcher identifiers (0009-0006-8416-6156).

View ORCID Record→
SINTA
SINTA
Awaiting ISSN & Akreditasi

The SINTA process is awaiting the journal ISSN and fulfillment of accreditation requirements.

DOAJ
DOAJ
Awaiting ISSN

The DOAJ application will proceed once the ISSN is available and all eligibility requirements are fulfilled.

Scopus
Scopus
Verified Author Profile

Official Scopus Author Profile (ID: 59675598500) integrated via ORCID, with 7 Scopus publications and h-index 2.

View Scopus Profile→
Web of Science
Web of Science
Verified ResearcherID

Official Web of Science ResearcherID (QKY-3514-2026) verified with Clarivate, integrating 16 scholarly publications.

View Clarivate Profile→

Publisher Verification
Official Entity

PublisherPT Bernas Sumut Jaya
Legal Entity (Kemenkumham)AHU-0034291.AH.01.01.2026
Klasifikasi KBLI58110 (Penerbitan Buku/Jurnal) & 63121 (Portal Web)
Status:Verified
Evidence: AHU Online
watermark

Publication Lifecycle Passport

Publication Lifecycle
Submitted26 Agu 2026
AI ScreeningCOMPLETED
Peer ReviewCOMPLETED
Published2 Sep 2026
Membership Evidence
Status: ACTIVE
Member ID: APS-2026-00125
Member Since: 2026
Expiration: 2027 (Verified)
Professional Certification
Status: Certified
Field: Research Methodology
Cert Number: CERT-2026-0042
Verification: Verified System
Journal Specifications
Model: Diamond Open Access
APC Charges: Free (Fully Funded)
Peer Review: Double Blind
Language: English
Editorial Process Evidence
Handling Editor: Editorial Office
Assigned Reviewers: 2 Reviewers
Review Duration: 14 days (Average)
Revision Count: 1 revision
AI Screening Assistant Logs
AI Screening: Completed (PASS)
Similarity Score: 14% Match (Safe)
COI: Not Detected
AI Recommendation: Accept
Technical Diagnostics
ROBOTS: PASS
SITEMAP: PASS
OAI: ACTIVE
SCHEMA: VALID
APASIFIC System Management Metadata™
APASIFIC-RIR-000001
APASIFIC Research Identity Registry™

Permanent Legacy Research Identity Record • Standard v1.0

Persistent Research Identifiers
ORCID iD
0009-0006-8416-6156
Scopus Author ID
59675598500
WoS ResearcherID
QKY-3514-2026
Google Scholar
e89cADYAAAAJ
SINTA Author ID
6019786
Metadata Steward:APASIFIC
Integrity Status:VERIFIED
Verification Authority:APASIFIC Research Quality & Intelligence Ecosystem
✦ Social Dissemination ✦TIKTOK & FB READY

Bagikan Naskah ke Media Sosial

Bagikan langsung ke Facebook, WhatsApp, atau buat kartu Story 9:16 untuk TikTok @apasificacademician.